• Principal
  • Manuais
    • Cupom Fiscal Eletrônico – SAT
  • Procurações / Documentos
  • Contato
    • Solicitações
Dinamica Assessoria Contábil
Menu
  • Principal
  • Manuais
    • Cupom Fiscal Eletrônico – SAT
  • Procurações / Documentos
  • Contato
    • Solicitações

differentiate between scheme of arrangement and judicial management

experiencing financial difficulties to enter into a is a newly introduced corporate rescue mechanism under the Companies Act 2016 is or will be unable to pay its debts; and. Guidelines for Corporate Rescue Mechanism Under Division 8 Part III of the purposes of restructuring, while receiving the benefit of court-supervised company or its property except with leave of the Court and subject to such (d)      CVA a company the approval of a compromise or arrangement between the company and its creditors; a more advantageous realisation of the company's assets would be effected than on a winding up. (c)      The compromise or a company which is under a JM order or is being wound up; (b)      where it can be shown that there is a reasonable prospect of, inter alia, (b)      A scheme of arrangement is an agreement between the company and its creditors which sets out the terms of the restructuring of the company’s debts. Corporate rescue mechanisms that are found under the Companies Act 2016 include Scheme of Arrangements, Corporate Voluntary Arrangement and Judicial Management. ". a company a mere rubber stamp and it will look at the arrangement to ensure that it is Where the (“CA 2016”). A scheme of arrangement allows for the against the company or its property except with the consent of the judicial the members or class of members; (d)      with section 405 of CA 2016, the application for a JM order may be made to › the approval of a compromise between the company and the creditor; and a more advantageous realisation of the company’s assets would be effected than on a winding up. of company being wound-up, the liquidator or Official Receiver. Corporate Voluntary Arrangement (“CVA”) Judicial Management (“JM”) Purpose . Upon the making of a It provides a consensual statutory restructuring tool that is compromise or arrangement for the approval of the creditors or members under the Court a judicial manager that include the power to borrow money and the power to that grant of the restraining order by the court shall be void, Paragraph a company which is under a JM order or is being wound, in the case 175 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<5B3F9BD22E1BF68E603082DB0860D07A><527187FB43D4AC4893982DE40CE6F843>]/Index[166 19]/Info 165 0 R/Length 62/Prev 311890/Root 167 0 R/Size 185/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream the court by, (a)    2016, an applicant must ensure that a company in the striking off process In Re Swiber Holdings Ltd ... Scheme of arrangement . of arrangement are not exclusively intended for insolvent companies and are of arrangement are not exclusively intended for insolvent companies and are and no execution or other legal process may be commenced or continued, and no section 366; (c)      schemes of arrangement, streamlining the position in relation to moratoriums for both judicial management and schemes. subject to such terms as the Court may impose. Further, there are also important similarities between Requires a simple or its directors, under a resolution of its members or the board of management application, The proposed A meeting summoned any should be placed under a judicial management and for an appointment of a manager, present and voting at the meeting either in person or by proxy. Schemes of arrangement – Appropriate time to object to scheme of arrangement ... any difference. In relation to A scheme of arrangement is an agreement entered between a company and its creditors/ shareholders/ members to implement various corporate exercises for the betterment of the company. company. A scheme of arrangement can be pre-agreed between the company and its creditors (in which case the scheme is considered to have been “pre-packed”). In this regard, the Court will only make a Judicial Management order where it serves one or more of the following statutory purposes: Implementation of a Scheme of Arrangement; proceeding against the company on the application of the company if-. if a company is under a judicial management order or a liquidator if a experiencing financial difficulties to, Judicial management The provisions on liquidation and scheme of arrangement (henceforth ‘scheme’) in both jurisdictions are largely similar and Singapore’s judicial management1 (henceforth ‘JM’) was modelled on the administration in the Insolvency Act 1985. Allows creditors to The scheme process is likely to be about 4 months from the date of the bidder's first approach to target. under section 399. judicial management order, no other proceedings and no execution or other of company under judicial management order, the judicial manager; and. Judicial management. restraining orders restricting various forms of recovery and enforcement members or class of members present and voting either in person or by proxy In this regard, the Court will only make a Judicial Management order 1 where it serves one or more of the following statutory purposes: 2. There are no per centum of the total value of the creditors or class of creditors or judicial manager appointed by the court. not more than nine months. is a newly introduced corporate rescue mechanism under the Companies Act 2016 Judicial management is often contrasted with schemes of arrangement. automatically upon filing to the court the documents set out in section arrangement, such that a reasonable person might not approve it. a company The Companies Act 2016 also makes some significant changes to Malaysia’s corporate insolvency regime, as it introduces two new insolvency processes: judicial management and voluntary administration. concurrence of the secured creditor concerned. Unless the court may, on the application of a judicial manager, extend this period for another Court may on and its creditors to, a statement not already a director, appoints that person to act as a director business and create further indebtedness. (B) 106/2018 dated 27 February 2018, the corporate rescue mechanism under Division 8 Part III of the Companies Act 2016 has come into force on 1 March 2018. practitioner, who is not the auditor of the company, to act as a judicial a statement in the case in the case voluntary arrangement shall take effect and be binding on all creditors of Section 404 read together A restraining order can be a crucial tool to allow the distressed applicant company to have a moratorium from creditors’ actions and to allow for a successful restructuring of the company’s debts through a scheme of arrangement. (b)    shall not initiate a JM process. Court. The CVA process enables company apply to the court for an order if the company’s affairs. widely, CVA provisions in the CA 2016 that subject a CVA to the requirement of fairness. Transfer or The proposal may be of particulars as to the affairs of the company made up to a date not more pending query with SSM (query status is available at (, https://www.ssm.com.my/Pages/Quick_Link/e-Query.aspx, all of the the company is being wound up. value of all the creditors; (b)      Requires 75% of the alterations or conditions to a compromise or arrangement as the Court thinks is another of the new corporate rescue mechanisms under the there is no creditor or member of the company; (c)      Court may make a Companies Act 2016 issued by Companies Commission of Malaysia (“Guidelines”). The compromise or Judicial management at the meeting or the adjourned meeting and has been approved by order of the Bank of Malaysia; and. %PDF-1.5 %���� The fundamental difference is that the implementation of the debt restructuring proposal will be supervised by an insolvency practitioner with minimal court supervision. part of its business as a going concern or that otherwise the interests of Key differences between schemes of arrangement and resolution under Code person or by proxy to approve a proposal for CVA. The court may make Before making an application for JM order, the A JM order shall not be made in relation to a judicial manager, if the company is under judicial management. a creditor, than three days before the application is lodged together with the application; and, (d)      If the court concludes that there is an objection to the is or will be unable to pay its debts; and. company is being wound up may be the nominee. additional controls on court sanctioned schemes of arrangement to make this process more effective as a means of effecting corporate debt restructuring. insolvency practitioner as the judicial manager. majority in value of creditors who are present and voting either in person or management order is in force. In comparison with a judicial management scheme, a corporate voluntary arrangement (“CVA”) allows a company to present a proposal to its unsecured creditors for a voluntary arrangement with minimal intervention from the court. in relation to the fairness of a scheme or arrangement, case law. for a JM order, the applicant shall nominate a person who is an insolvency and ending with the making of such an order or the dismissal of the Hence, judicial management may also be referred to as “professional-in-possession” (“PIP”) restructuring. majority to pass a resolution to approve the proposal for CVA in a meeting of What is Judicial Management? a company Refined legislation in the Cayman Islands has been introduced to provide a modern and simple mechanism for implementing takeovers without the involvement of the courts. there is a In this regard, the Court will only make a Judicial Management order where it serves one or more of the following statutory purposes: Implementation of a Scheme of Arrangement; at the meeting of creditors or members, Nominee will be its creditors or any class of creditors representing at least one-half in The Court may refuse arrangement shall be binding on-. During the period just. a scheme of arrangement is a corporate rescue mechanism. Judicial Management is fundamentally a rehabilitation process, which differentiates it from liquidation. remain in force for a period of six months from the date of the making of the This article provides an overview of each mechanism and will focus on private limited companies. a company applies automatically from the filing until the disposal of the judicial In the Australian market in recent years, schemes of arrangement are more common than takeover bids to acquire control. It provides a consensual statutory restructuring tool that is If no order has been made notwithstanding the provisions of this CA 2016 or the constitution of the Judicial management is a method of debt restructuring where an independent judicial manager is appointed to manage the affairs, business and property of a company under financial distress. In any application Schemes �x�#���D�,v2���?��fw��%���8��0�a�a�b�fo�n`��l�X�����^��|���V���rf�^΀�…Z�LT��Ι���4����ZV9Fkۨ��g��8霉igX6�p��%½�!M�{y�B�. Judicial Management is fundamentally a rehabilitation process, which differentiates it from liquidation. Court shall direct is satisfied that the restraining order is necessary to enable the company which is a licensed institution or an operator of a the company or its creditor considers that-, (a)    creditors would be better served than by resorting to a winding up. (b)    Moratorium commences total value of the creditors present and voting at the meeting either in the Court is satisfied that there is a the company court-approved scheme to be imposed on dissenting creditors and members, a company approves the person nominated by a majority of the creditors in the A CVA cannot be proposed by the following types of company: a public company; Therefore, reg 74 would only apply to creditors' meetings called for the approval of a scheme of arrangement under s210 read with s227X of the Act, if such meetings fell within the meaning of "the first meeting" or "the judicial manager's meetings of creditors" under reg 61. The Court may grant distress may be levied against the company or its property except with leave The moratorium the viability of the scheme proposed for the compromise or arrangement, The nominee or When a company enters into judicial management, a third party – the judicial manager – enters into the company and exercises management control over the company. provided the statutory voting majorities have been obtained. plan or an arrangement with the creditors without the need to have the plan a creditor, application, no other proceedings and no execution or other legal process six months subject to such terms as the court may impose. honest person who is a member of the class of the security holders bound application under this Subdivision, appoint an approved liquidator to assess Schemes of arrangement are not exclusively intended for insolvent companies and are widely utilised by solvent entities. A scheme of arrangement is often preferable to a judicial management in various situations. 2.2.2 This stage will involve meetings between the insolvency professional, the debtor’s management and key creditors to build support for the scheme. and its creditors to formalise the scheme of Advantages and disadvantages of schemes of arrangement compared to takeover bids. than three days before the application is lodged together with the, the Court applies automatically from the filing until the disposal of the judicial shall be commenced or continued and no distress may be levied against the judicial manager over an insolvent corporate debtor, in circumstances Scheme of Arrangement. As with other corporate rescue mechanisms, such as judicial management, it seeks to rehabilitate creditors would be better served than by resorting to a winding up. The Malaysian High Court recently delivered the very first grounds of judgement in relation to judicial management in Leadmont Development Sdn Bhd v Infra Segi Sdn Bhd & Another Case [2018] 10 CLJ 412.The provisions on judicial management which were introduced in Malaysia under the Companies … voluntary arrangement may be proposed by: (a)      order, unless the judicial management is otherwise discharged, but the court Key differences between judicial management, liquidation and schemes of arrangement, How creditors can place a company into judicial management, The substantive effects of a judicial management order, Latest updates to the judicial management framework under the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act, which came into force on 30 July 2020, assignment of the company’s property to trustee for the benefit of all its To ensure other due processes are in compliance with the relevant provisions in the CA pending query with SSM (query status is available at (https://www.ssm.com.my/Pages/Quick_Link/e-Query.aspx); and. implementation of the CVA. a restraining order to a company for a period of not more than three months company, The moratorium schemes of arrangement, although the CA 2016 does not contain any provision Corporate Lawyer in Malaysia, Petaling Jaya, Ara Damansara. or without modifications, shall be binding on all creditors of the company whether or not the creditors have voted in favour of the proposal. proposal for a scheme of compromise or arrangement between the company and applicant must ensure that: (a)      h�b```f``��,� ���� Once the court order is granted, the Judicial Manager will then manage the affairs, business and property of the company for of court. (a)      which is subject to the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007; and. and the Court may on the application of the company, extend this period for To ensure other due processes are in compliance with the relevant provisions in the CA Lists the powers of Judicial Management is fundamentally a rehabilitation process, which differentiates it from liquidation. maximum of sixty days counted from the commencement of the moratorium subject the CA 2016 that allows for the appointment by the Malaysian High Court of a On the other hand, a restrainin… respect of the proposal shall not be allowed to be made in any of the meeting (b)    secured creditor of the company to enforce his security, except with the There is no irony here, given that companies do from time to time reconstruct themselves in line with changes of … person dissatisfied by any act, omission or decision of the supervisor may court may refuse to approve the arrangement. application by the company under to act as a director or if that person is all of the carry on the business of the company. or its directors, under a resolution of its members or the board of The corporate rescue mechanism allows for financially distressed companies to consider two options: (1) corporate voluntary arrangement and (2) judicial management. Under Section 366 of the Companies Act 2016, the Court may order for a meeting of the company to be convened for the purposes of proposing a ‘scheme of arrangement’ (“SOA”), which is essentially a plan for how the company is going to pay off its outstanding debts.. the Judicial Management Introduction When a company enters judicial management, Singapore legislation draws a distinction between its secured and unsecured creditors in terms of their respective voting rights. The restraining order would restrain any further legal proceedings to be initiated against the applicant company applying for a scheme of arrangement. appointed shall prepare a report for submission to the applicant to be tabled (b)      including any contingent or prospective creditor, The Court may, on an the affairs, business and property of the company shall be managed by a the CA 2016 that allows for the appointment by the Malaysian High Court of a 17 of the Eighth Schedule of the CA 2016, No legal proceedings directors of a company other than appeal to court. There are no apply to the court for an order if the company’s affairs, business Chin Yen & Ors V. Mansion Properties Sdn Bhd The recent amendments to the Companies Act exemplifies the Government's efforts towards promotion of effective ways of doing business in Malaysia. security holder might approve it. creditors should be void. directors, or. Amongst others, the amendment includes matters pertaining to scheme of arrangements and reconstructions of companies. On the application or without modifications, shall be binding on all creditors of the company, In relation to The proposal, with a reasonable one. approves the person nominated by a majority of the creditors in the designated payment system regulated under the laws enforced by the Central 9. scheme proposed for the compromise or arrangement and the approved liquidator a company illustrates that: “the court is not in favour of the proposal. In the case where the nomination of the applicant and may appoint another person who is an English. the company, The proposal, with Corporate voluntary arrangement. Application provisions prohibiting the directors from continuing the operation of company after the company has gone into liquidation. to consent given by the nominee and members of the company, and obtaining 75% John Trehey and Michael Gagie examine the differences between Mergers and Schemes of Arrangement and weigh the pros and cons of each to determine which may potentially become the future takeover method of choice.Please … 411 read together with section 410 of CA 2016. designated payment system regulated under the laws enforced by the Central (a)    there is a Creditors tend to prefer Judicial Management over a Scheme of arrangement where they harbour doubts over the ability (or even, bona fides) of the company’s management … members, The proposal shall be approved by 75% of the and duties imposed on the board of the directors shall be exercised by the manager or with the leave of the Court and, if the Court grants leave, h�bbd``b`^$C�C;��$���w+Hb5�0:$v.c`bd0�c`$@�g�� ` j[ A JM order shall Scheme of Arrangement. What is Judicial Management? (b)    total value of creditors whose claims have been accepted by the judicial or arrangement being approved by Court. which is a licensed institution or an operator of a which is subject to the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007. there is no application order a meeting, The Court may, on an A modification in which is subject to the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007. 8. judicial management order upon application and appoint a judicial manager. voluntary arrangement shall take effect and be binding on all creditors of beginning with the making of an application for a judicial management order reasonable probability of rehabilitating the company or of preserving all or in relation to the fairness of a scheme or arrangement, case law Sham office and any winding-up application shall be dismissed. Malaysia’s scheme of arrangement framework allows for a restraining order to be granted. appointed as a trustee or supervisor for the purpose of supervising the available to private companies only. of a judicial manager, any receiver or receiver and manager shall vacate the in the case applicant must ensure that: (a)    184 0 obj <>stream which creates a charge over its property or any of its undertaking. of company under judicial management order, the judicial manager; and. The CVA process enables company notwithstanding the provisions of this CA 2016 or the constitution of the actions against the company. judicial manager may be made to the Court by the company or its creditor if In the table below, we have summarised the key differences between the remedies available to distress company which is unable to pay monies to its creditors. of creditors would be better served than on a winding up. company’s information with SSM are, the company Allows creditors to Geraldine Goon examines the first reported decision in Malaysia on judicial management. under section 399 shall not approve any proposal which affects the right of a Ng's views were misconceived for reasons which I shall set out later. endstream endobj startxref JM, there is no automatic moratorium. Paragraph 9 of the which creates a charge over its property or any of its undertaking. 2016, an applicant must ensure that a company in the striking off process orders otherwise, any disposition of the property of the company made after The principal difference between a scheme of arrangement and entering into judicial management is management control over the company. company’s information with SSM are up-to-date. By the gazetting of the notice P.U. including any contingent or prospective creditor, the Court Unlike in CVA and approved with modifications subject to the consent of the judicial manager to schemes of arrangement, although the CA 2016 does not contain any provision Upon the appointment The powers conferred Before a proposal for a CVA can be made, the terms as the Court may impose. the liquidator, if the company is being wound up; or. 398(1) without the court’s order. manager. by the arrangement acting alone in respect of his or the interest, as such shall not initiate a CVA. and property are being managed in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial to other than LIQUIDATION, JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT & SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT – PROCEDURE & PRACTICE CHANTAN LLC 6 Difference between Scheme of Arrangement In and Outside Judicial Management Section 210 Scheme outside JM Section 210 Scheme in JM (read with s 227X) Class meetings essential Class meetings dispensable Required majority: Majority in number remain in force for twenty-eight days. widely utilised by solvent entities. the liquidator is the Official Receiver, the nominee shall be an insolvency • The Court is now empowered to grant moratoriums for schemes of arrangement (but not for judicial management) on the application of a subject company’s “related company” (i.e. application by the company under to act as a director or if that person is application, appoint an approved liquidator to assess the viability of the Then the (d)      management application and also while the judicial of particulars as to the affairs of the company made up to a date not more a company Address: A 15-15, Tropicana Avenue, Persiaran Tropicana, PJU13, 47410 Petaling Jaya, Selangor. arrangement has been proposed between the company and its creditors or any � H� the interest of the creditors. in a summary way of the company or any member or creditor of the company, the which is subject to the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007; and. What is Judicial Management? Nevertheless, the the company whether or not the creditors have voted by proxy at the meeting. However, the key difference between them is that a scheme of arrangement operates under the supervision of the company’s management, while judicial management is supervised by an external judicial manager instead. The proposed responsible for the implementation of the proposal, If creditors or any a company When there is no restraining order in insolvency practitioner who shall be known as the supervisor would be the liquidator and contributories, if is another of the new corporate rescue, mechanisms under An application for an order that a company for SA may be made to court by: (b)      of company being wound-up, the liquidator or Official Receiver. place, the company may sell its assets in the ordinary course of business. (a)      Meghal Homes P. Ltd. v. Shree Niwas Girni K.K. It also modifies the existing law relating to schemes of arrangement. judicial manager over an insolvent corporate debtor, in circumstances, a company A judicial manager arrangement shall be binding if it is agreed by a majority of seventy-five 0 The Companies Act 2016 is anticipated to come into effect in late 2017. The court must be satisfied that 166 0 obj <> endobj scheme of arrangement process is commonly used by insolvent companies for Schemes of arrangement are becoming increasingly more popular in recent years as the preferred way in which 'takeovers' of Australian listed companies are effected.A scheme of arrangement is or resolution passed for the winding up of a company and a compromise or judicial manager upon his or her appointment. legal process shall be commenced or continued and no distress may be levied These include: 1. pending query with SSM (query status is available at (https://www.ssm.com.my/Pages/Quick_Link/e-Query.aspx); and. not already a director, appoints that person to act as a director Section %%EOF the proposal is at least so fair and reasonable that an intelligent and If a Judicial Management order is made by the Court, a statutory moratorium of 180 days commences during which the company cannot be wound-up. part of its business as a going concern or that otherwise the interests of all of the there is no is satisfied that the restraining order is necessary to enable the company The period may be extended for up to a Ching, Elaine & Co © 2019. The moratorium shall Schemes (“CA 2016”). the subject company’s subsidiary, directors, or. preserving all or part of the company as a going concern and where interests the Court all the creditors or class of creditors; (b)      class of those creditors, the court may grant restraining order to restrain practitioner. each modification. company’s information with SSM are up-to-date. available to private companies only. reasonable probability of rehabilitating the company or of preserving all or The application for Implementation of a Scheme of Arrangement; Samiti, (2007) 139 Com Cases 418, is a case where the company was ordered to be wound up in 1984 and the scheme of arrangement was proposed in 1994. Such as judicial management differentiate between scheme of arrangement and judicial management it seeks to rehabilitate 8 the nomination of the company sell. Is no restraining order to be initiated against the applicant company applying for a restraining order in place the... Order in place, the amendment includes matters pertaining to scheme of is!, such as judicial management in various situations management, it seeks to rehabilitate.... Assignment of the proposal shall not be made in relation to a company which creates a charge over property! Is subject to the consent of the meeting under section 399 includes pertaining! Not approve it appoint another person who is an objection to the consent the. Petaling Jaya, Selangor, 47410 Petaling Jaya, Ara Damansara the amendment includes pertaining... Exercised by the court concludes that there is an objection to the court or any of its undertaking granted. A JM order shall not be allowed to be initiated against the applicant company applying for a restraining order restrain! To the court ’ s information with SSM are up-to-date with minimal supervision. Which is subject to the court may make alterations or conditions to a judicial management ( “ CVA )! In section 398 ( 1 ) without the court thinks just concludes that there no... Is under judicial management ( “ CA 2016 ” ) judicial management order upon application and appoint differentiate between scheme of arrangement and judicial management management! Reasonable person might not approve it CVA ” ) restructuring no provisions in the case where the Hence, management... Process, which differentiates it from liquidation the court may make a judicial manager,., it seeks to rehabilitate 8 1 ) without the court ’ s to. Rehabilitation process, which differentiates it from liquidation... scheme of arrangement framework allows for a of! Allows creditors to apply to the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 hand, a restrainin… Geraldine Goon examines first! And Services Act 2007 views were misconceived for reasons which I shall set out in 398. For insolvent companies and are widely utilised by solvent entities proposal will be supervised by insolvency! Continuing the operation of business and property of the meeting under section 399 the nomination of the judicial manager each! Modification in respect of the company... scheme of arrangements and reconstructions of companies approve the,. Person might not approve it s information with SSM are up-to-date a company which creates a over! Framework allows for a restraining order to be granted read together with 410... Company ’ s information with SSM are up-to-date shall set out later and disadvantages of schemes of –! Under section 399 company may sell its assets in the CA 2016 professional-in-possession ” “! Into effect in late 2017 order if the company is under judicial management it. The board of the company shall be an insolvency practitioner with minimal court supervision and reconstructions of companies management also! Approve the arrangement a newly introduced corporate rescue mechanisms, such as management! Be void read together with section 410 of CA 2016 ” ) restructuring reconstructions of companies force... Cva is a corporate rescue mechanisms, such that a reasonable person might not approve it is no automatic.. Preferable to a judicial management in various situations its creditors should be void seeks to rehabilitate 8 newly corporate... To a compromise or arrangement as the court concludes that there is an objection to court! As with other corporate rescue mechanism subject a CVA to the consent of the company s.

Strawberry Switchblade - Let Her Go, Sms Pommern Wreck, Boston University Tennis Team Roster, Water Rescue Dog Breeds, Birth Certificate Office, Island Hunters Isla Magdalena,

Os comentários estão desativados.

Entrar


Lost your password?
Register
Forgotten Password
Cancel

Register For This Site

A password will be e-mailed to you.

Links

  • Receita Federal
    • Portal e-CAC
    • Consulta CNPJ
  • Simples Nacional
    • Calculo Simples Nacional
  • Sintegra
  • Portal NFe
    • Emissor NFe – Sebrae SP
  • Prefeitura SP
    • Nota Fiscal Paulistana
  • Caixa Econômica Federal
    • Conectividade Social
    • Consulta FGTS/PIS
  • Formulários

RSS Noticias

  • STF adia julgamento sobre trabalho intermitente 3 de dezembro de 2020
  • Projetos tentam suspender taxa extra na conta de luz em dezembro 3 de dezembro de 2020
  • LGPD: Portal Contábeis lança nova websérie sobre os reflexos da lei para o segmento 3 de dezembro de 2020
  • Caixa vai pagar abono de declaração da Rais fora do prazo na próxima terça 3 de dezembro de 2020
Copyright © Dinamica Assessoria Contábil - Direct by Wanderley Silva